IRC intervenes in the Clyde River Supreme Court of Canada appeal

INUVIK, NT, Nov. 30, 2016 /CNW/ – The Inuvialuit Regional Corporation (IRC) is delivering oral arguments today before the Supreme Court of Canada in the appeal of Hamlet of Clyde River et al v PGS et al. The IRC represents the Inuvialuit under the Inuvialuit Final Agreement.

The case involves a decision by the National Energy Board (NEB) to authorize seismic testing in Baffin Bay and the Davis Straight.  The testing would project sound loud enough to severely affect whales and other marine life harvested by the Inuvialuit. The Inuvialuit right to harvest these animals is a central guarantee of the Inuvialuit Final Agreement (IFA).

“The Inuvialuit have many years of experience dealing with offshore oil and gas exploration,” says Duane Smith, Chair and CEO of IRC. “We want to see development conducted responsibly without eroding the hard-won rights under the IFA including our right to be engaged using its constitutionally protected review processes.”

“People often assume that other governments, like provinces and municipalities, make decisions that are reasonable unless shown otherwise.  But they don’t assume that Aboriginal governments will make reasonable decisions if they are consulted about development projects. In our view, reconciliation means that Aboriginal governments, with years of experience making responsible resource development decisions, must also be trusted to be reasonable.”

Kate Darling, lawyer for the IRC, explained that IRC is advocating that the legal principle of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC), set out in the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, should guide Aboriginal consultation where modern land claim rights are at stake.

“FPIC doesn’t provide a veto to Aboriginal peoples to just say ‘no’ to projects. What it does instead is level the playing field so that everyone is working towards the same goal,” she said.  Darling said that the principle of FPIC is the logical extension of previous court cases on Aboriginal consultation, and provides more meat on the bones about what the Crown’s obligations really are when a high degree of consultation is required.  “Consultation is about mutual respect, and many Aboriginal groups, including the Inuvialuit, feel as though the Crown’s current approach does not start from a place of seeing Aboriginal as equal partners,” she said. “FPIC is really about getting to a more respectful process.”

SOURCE The Inuvialuit Regional Corporation (IRC)

Be the first to comment on "IRC intervenes in the Clyde River Supreme Court of Canada appeal"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.